𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

I will believe in god once someone proves god exists. Still waiting.

⧖expiring ~30d0/25 kept31m ago

𓀐 @YV-vM6q*

⏱ 1d 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱
filter [-]
𓀐 @XJ7md=Lc: Creation needs a creator to exist.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 2

𓀐 @vLV?LuB7: Because the universe is dependent on God, whereas God is not dependent on the universe. The one the current year is named after.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @qr5yn5WE: Name one thing in the universe that stands on its own / isn’t dependent+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @6kUP=av?: The universe? Meaning the totality of dependent phenomena? Aggregating dependentes doesn’t arrive you to independence. Ergo even the universe itself is dependent too. That was actually my next move.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @3LfpZvsk: God is a force of nature. Its real because there is no other explanation for why things happen other than "it is what it is." It is not sentient or moral, but a force of creation and life. Religions are mere interpretations of what people think should be done to manipulate this force via anthropomorphizing this force. None of these religions are any more true than the persons belief in them. Cultural God is something you can only convince yourself to believe in, Natural God is real.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @ff9HQd4J: Axiom 1: If φ is a positive property, and if it is necessarily true (true in all possible worlds) that every object with property φ also has property ψ, then ψ is also a positive property. Axiom 2: The negation of a property φ is positive if, and only if, φ is not positive. Theorem 1: If a property φ is positive, then it is possible that there exists an object x that has this property (in at least one possible world, there exists an object x that has this property). Definition 1: An object x is God-like if, and only if, x has all positive properties. Axiom 3: The property of being God-like is itself a positive property. Theorem 2: It is possible that there exists a God-like object x (in at least one possible world, there exists a God-like object x). Definition 2: A property φ is an essential property of an object x if, x has property φ, and every property ψ of x necessarily (in all possible worlds) and generally (for all objects) follows from φ. Axiom 4: If a property φ is positive, then it is necessarily positive (positive in all possible worlds). Theorem 3: If x is God-like, then being God-like is an essential property of x. Definition 3: An object x "exists necessarily" if each of its essential properties φ applies, in each possible world, to some object y. Axiom 5: "Necessary existence" is a positive property. Theorem 4: It is necessarily true (true in all possible worlds) that a God-like object exists.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @oLQUmspJ: Definition of a property, a property is the quality of an object, so if a property exists, it must be because it belongs to an object.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @QU59sY+n: >Do you even KNOW what a point is? Can you define it? Can you even read, I have directed you to a definition of points several times now? Godel could see it and many of his contemporaries and future generation of scientists and logicians have confirmed his findings as well, you are delusional as a mechanism to protect your ego from your ignorance.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @DxENiFSJ: You're conflating inference with existence. Sure points are a useful construct, but they aren't actually necessary for physical existence. This was literally proven by the way, you can't construct geometry without points whatsoever. Physics and math just use them because they're convenient.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @yD49BBJ4: I have a 156 IQ. Try again?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @uyWYX-5p: Right right very interesting. But I'm curious, why do you pretend God doesn't exist? Spite? Because he says homosexuality is bad? I'm genuinely curious.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @UAV~ut*x: 0 for 10. Try again?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @3*MRs3CW: >Why do you tell yourself X? >X Let me guess: You don't have a PhD in comp sci from Stanford?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @EqSzW3hH: Yeah but why though? xD You're very dumb, by the way!+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @6eAzUXyF: Ive answered the question dozens of times, retard. No one is pretending. The king james bible is not the word of God and isn't God. Why is clinging to the false religion of christianity so important to you?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ak59-Qos: No, telling you that no one is pretending is not just asserting a point, it is giving you the answer. No one "pretends" that god isn't real. God isn't real and christianity has been disproved.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @dBS7WMoP: Nope. Jesus is never coming back little buddy. The bible is not the word of God. The earth is not 6300 years old. You are mentally retarded.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Yo_hpGUA: >nonsense babble Grow up.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0