𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

It’s mathematically impossible and illogical 1+1+1 ≠ 1 1+1+1 = 3

⧖expiring ~28d0/27 kept2d ago

𓀐 @uE89kaK-

⏱ 3d 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]
𓀐 @SAcETsj+: >My IQ is over 3 standard deviations greater than yours. No, Randy, it's not. I have a higher IQ and a better educational pedigree than you do. Best of all, I'm going to Heaven when I die. >Geologists at MIT and Oxford University pretend they can accurately age rocks. Yeah, unfortunately that doesn't mean much. Even at my school a big part of social signaling is being very loud about evolution and big bang. The truth is you can't date a rock by scanning it with electrical computer or putting it in a test tube: >Young-earth creationist Dr. Stephen Austin collected dacite rock samples from the Mount St. Helens lava dome in 1992 (about 10 years after the 1980 eruption) and sent them for potassium-argon (K-Ar) dating, which yielded incorrect ages ranging from 350,000 to 2.8 million years. >Shit for brains, the earth is substantially older than 6300 years old. The bible is wrong and is not the word of God. Verse?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @9GWE?kmu: 1 x 1 x 1 = 1+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @9?5PQGLt: Its easy to explain.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @tH6cwNqM: Wow, we have so many heresies in one image. Arianism, Subordinationism, Partialism, Pneumatomachianism, Pantheism, and Tritheism+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @NtNZ6hNN: Do you also count apples in a basket by multiplying them to each other to make a total? If so you need to go back to first grade. It's obvious we count gods the regular way we do everything else. When you count Zeus and Hermes is that 1 god (Zeus) x 1 god (Hermes) = 1 god or is that 1 god (Zeus) + 1 god (Hermes) = 2 gods? You also can't resort to special pleading here because you also use the regular counting method for the persons in the godhead+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @xeQ=~Wfr: If you're eating a green apple, a yellow apple, or a red apple, it's still essentially an apple. You can't say it's a pear or a walnut+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @SKGEk*GK: >If you're eating a green apple, a yellow apple, or a red apple, it's still essentially an apple Those are 3 separate individual apples, unless you're talking about 1 individual apple with all of the characteristic colors you gave as an example. Do you see the problem? Calling 3 seperate apples "an apple" is wrong. You're using a singular identifier for what is objectively a plurality. This doesn't magically start making sense when you try to use "god" in place of "apples" either.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @y6y56pxs: you need to study more advanced math+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @g?~UthPd: i, j, and k make three square roots of -1, not one square root of -1. In fact, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion >In H [the quaternions] there are infinitely many square roots of minus one Applied to the trinity, that's polytheism.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @pNN336ZN: Because God is Eternal Goodness, Truth and Love (there is a debate whether the original term meant Love or Charity, but it is not as important as it seems since Charity is the top virtue in Christian theology). God can allow Satan to lead us into temptation though, and Christ says Himself that Satan has asked God for Peter (Simon in the text). That's why we say "lead us not into temptation" which sounds misleading to modern ears but the Church tradition clearly specifies it's not because God does it Himself but because He allows it. Christ also says "Thy Will be done" which is just as important if not more so. And Christ Himself is lead into temptation by men and demonsl+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @u9ALvh72: So we should not believe the Word of Christ in the New Testament? Are you a jew?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @y~fK5f-b: Essentially you are still eating an apple and not another fruit. Yes you pray to the Trinity when you pray to Christ or the Father or the Holy Ghost. Why is this so confusing?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @XCsSSkcn: It’s called a mystery for a reason. All you need to know is that if you think you understand, you don’t understand. You were never meant to understand, and it’s not your place to understand. This is all a deliberate humiliation for those who think human reason is all you will need.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @wgiy3Nmc: https://www.enjoyhell.com+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @LtAnWPiZ: >Numbers don't "make" other numbers It's a standard English expression https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/9053/should-i-use-the-singular-or-plural-verb-in-mathematical-formulae-two-and-two >Those numbers "are" square roots of -1 Yes, square roots. Roots. Multiple roots. >But it is still one God just like i, j,k are one number No, they're three numbers, each of which when squared equals the number negative one. It isn't the case that i, j, and k, are each *the* square root of negative one. They are each *a* square root of negative one. The expression sqrt(-1) by itself doesn't clearly point to one number in the context of the quaternions. Strictly, sqare roots wouldn't point to just one number even in the integers, since, e.g. both 2 and -2 when squared equal four, except for the convention that sqrt(x) refers to only the positive root of x. But in the quaternions, there are multiple "positive roots" so the convention breaks down.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @?=4FNdZd: >things The Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are not "things" And nature is what God created. It's impossible for me to answer your questions if you can't articulate them. Ask and it shall be given+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @KpTBz=24: >Wrong. Okay where in the bible does it mention that Jesus spoke in Koine Greek? I've read the bible so I know you wont find anything. You are incorrect. >The other anon's confusion. That's all you, bud. >Jesus is pretty clear on Who He is Then why didn't he write it down? >No you Oh man what a convincing thing to say! We're all so convinced of your side of the argument now.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @jF_6kzrT: Reasonable people are not convinced by your arguments & claims. They're not even correct on their face >Where Peter calls him Christ. I asked when Jesus spoke Koine Greek. Peter is not Jesus, anon. The gospel of Peter was written 100 years after Jesus was already dead in the ground. It's not a reliable source of information regarding what Jesus actually said anyway. >He did, He wrote everything in His Disciples' hearts Lmao this is really silly cope. You can do better than this spiritually Jewish cult fanfiction, right? Jesus wrote Koine Greek in their hearts?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @dz2M62ZX: As expected you'll just have to resort to special pleading. Only your gods get counted in special ways and only when it's convenient. When it comes to the persons suddenly you have no problem applying the "pagan" (read normal) counting method.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @KmogB5Dw: A human being has just 1 person, ITT we can see that the only way the trinity can be defended is either to call everyone the same human being or say that every human being consists of multiple persons. Also no see what Aquinas says "the individuals of the rational nature have a special name even among other substances; and this name is "person". So how many individuals of a rational nature do you have in your head? If it's more than 1 you suffer from multiple personality disorder. Seek help anon(s)+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @6~H6oYoU: Nice straw man but normal people don't suffer that way anon. I realize a trinitarian who has to jump through a million hoops just to worship thinks everyone is afflicted by severe forms of cognitive dissonance every moment in their life. But I can assure you it doesn't happen with people outside your cult. It's possible to have 1 personality+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @WEpgG-?T: >MUH MATH This is a red herring issue because the Trinitarians and the Antis are counting two different things. This thread would be less retarded if we established the identity of what is being counting. The underlying question is if Father = God and Son = God then why Father =/= Son?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @8KHa?8kK: That's modalism, Patrick. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/how-not-to-share-the-trinity >Another popular but false analogy is the following: the Trinity is like how water can be ice, liquid, and steam. This again commits the heresy of modalism.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @xYXTroi2: why can't christcucks simply be honest (and theologically accurate) and simply say that the trinity is a mystery you have to accept and no analogy could ever explain it since god doesn't work like a material object+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @jPSGeYe_: >are the flames in the observable material plane I guess theoretically, but good luck getting down there. Personally I don't understand why you just take the get out of Hell free card Jesus bought for you.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @a_~mKikg: The fact that the earth is filled with fire has nothing to do with its age, of course. Not that you have the brainpower to distinguish disparate facts from the monolith of "SCIENCE" in your worthless mind. Fuck I can't wait for you rodent to get tossed in the pit. >free card >have to do a shit ton of things No, that's not how it works. You don't understand what the word "Free" means. Worthless brain. God does exist, and he hates you. Deal with it.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0