Are abrahamic religions right about pork?

𓀐 @XN**8yQw: They were back in the day when food prep was more difficult. The problem with pigs is that they will eat ANYTHING, which makes it a lot easier to have parasites and other illnesses survive in the meat unless you are able to afford to cook it properly. In ancient times that was harder to do and a lot of people would fuck it up. It was easier to just ban the eating of those animals so the local retards wouldn't spread disease after fucking up their campfire cookout. that is less feasible than you…+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Et?bLn9z: No, they banned them because everyone saw them as filthy things and assumed their meat was also filthy was what made people sick. You are a retarded faggot that read the scripture and took it at face value. People would eat pork that had spoiled unexpectedly fast in the heat or that had not been cooked well, and would start growing worms in their muscles. Meanwhile OTHER animals were banned for different reasons. Camels were literally too valuable to eat. Shellfish make you sick easily Carrion…+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @pz8MjLTC: Then why did the smartest scientists in human history all believe in that wisdom, hmmmmmm? Checkmate, "atheist" >"Fusion in the next 15 years, for sure!" >"The big freeze is coming, global cooling will kill us all from climate change!" nice projection :) faggots like this are eternally assmad over nothing. they unironically worship the IDEA of science as a religion and scientists as magical priests who only tell truth. They will spend HOURS arguing across various boards about this stuff. Every…+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @J8oPZ=Bi: That wasn't what I was asking you, let's try again and I'll make it simpler this time. Do you believe that lusting after males as a male is objectively wrong? Yes or No then qualify with your reasoning >oh he will never answer a question that he can't bullshit his way around. It seems like you were able to predict the future that instance lol >He formed a fucked up pseudo-religion around worshipping the IDEA of science without actually being scientific, and hates anything that doesnt conform to…+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @3e6SqGEG: >superstitious pre-scientific cavemen who believed in a little ghost inside your head who will be pulled underground after you die and burned by ghost-fire by a bipedal billy-goat if you masturbate too much >right about anything at all+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @~_Dvp~e2: Whst is even the reason why they ban pork+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @XN**8yQw: They were back in the day when food prep was more difficult. The problem with pigs is that they will eat ANYTHING, which makes it a lot easier to have parasites and other illnesses survive in the meat unless you are able to afford to cook it properly. In ancient times that was harder to do and a lot of people would fuck it up. It was easier to just ban the eating of those animals so the local retards wouldn't spread disease after fucking up their campfire cookout. that is less feasible than you think. collecting wood and charcoal was money.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @msh~ySuT: Scandinavians ate pork all the time. Was the concept of cooking your pig for a longer time too complex for abrahamic sand-jeets?+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @j6ab~boi: I believe Europeans ate pork because they had fewer health issues due to the different environment than what the Middle East had.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Et?bLn9z: No, they banned them because everyone saw them as filthy things and assumed their meat was also filthy was what made people sick. You are a retarded faggot that read the scripture and took it at face value. People would eat pork that had spoiled unexpectedly fast in the heat or that had not been cooked well, and would start growing worms in their muscles. Meanwhile OTHER animals were banned for different reasons. Camels were literally too valuable to eat. Shellfish make you sick easily Carrion animals consume filthy things so it comes back to pigs Vermin are banned again for being filthy. Religious rules like this are rules that were originally made by smart people who saw patterns and were trying to make sure that stupid people like YOU didn't do something bad. They found a safe pattern of cloven hooves and chewing cud that satisfied them, decided it was God's work, and wrote the rule as >this is a sign from god that you can safely eat this thing+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @tdF6jPX-: But thats not the reason given for the bans. There are plenty of random and arbitrary rules and traditions in religions but for some reason people try to defend abrahamic books about magic men in the sky that the reason something was prohibited something mustve been based on something rational and isn't just completely arbitrary random bullshit like everything else in the books.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 2

𓀐 @9eSM~JY~: >bUh DaTs nOt wUh dUh ReAsOn dEy tOlD dA rEtArDs WuHz! trying to sit down and explain to an idiot like you something as simple as "evolution, technological innovations, and philosophical writings mean we KNOW these people were not stupid" is too hard for your tiny pea brain to comprehend. Its easier to tell retards "God says so" to get dumbfucks like you to obey. These days we just say "scientists said so" and you numbly clap and obey all the same.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Bn3R_gMd: I agree but they probably were dressing the practical reasons up in religious autism so dumb retard goat herders would understand it. That’s what happened with a lot of things in the OT+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @msm7VQUx: Look i get it you believe desert fairytales to cope with your insecurites or out of societal obligation.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @pz8MjLTC: Then why did the smartest scientists in human history all believe in that wisdom, hmmmmmm? Checkmate, "atheist" >"Fusion in the next 15 years, for sure!" >"The big freeze is coming, global cooling will kill us all from climate change!" nice projection :) faggots like this are eternally assmad over nothing. they unironically worship the IDEA of science as a religion and scientists as magical priests who only tell truth. They will spend HOURS arguing across various boards about this stuff. Every day. All they do is bitch and cry about religion. I never bothered to guess because I have seen this type of faggot crying in the exact way across multiple boards for something like a decade now.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @rTDP--GF: What the fuck is that word salad? Stop seething and maybe you'd make some sense. >I'm talking about insecurities or complexes an individual possesses that make them need a 'magic man in the sky' to exist when he doesn't. Is this what you meant?+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @+Udwo~QV: How did two mispellings make it an incromphensible when you clearly understood perfectly what it meant? But don't have an actual answer to give.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @v?WDBHLs: You used to seethe for hours on end in the exact same way on the board for porn GIFs back before it was 100% tranny and blacked stuff. making random ass threads to scream for hours about "muh abrahamic religions" just as you clearly are doing on this board. How fascinating. You got slapped by the mods one day in your schizo rants and found this place it seems. But this board doesn't move fast enough so instead you seem to just scream into the void slowly over the course of a day.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @vnq-YPX?: See the sissy-hypno atheist doesn't even have a reason to preserve that. His pleasure is all that matters here and he only has at best a few decades to indulge in all of it before he rots in the ground So why aren't you answering my question then? Don't shift the topic, we need to find out why you're so buttmad about religion.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @J8oPZ=Bi: That wasn't what I was asking you, let's try again and I'll make it simpler this time. Do you believe that lusting after males as a male is objectively wrong? Yes or No then qualify with your reasoning >oh he will never answer a question that he can't bullshit his way around. It seems like you were able to predict the future that instance lol >He formed a fucked up pseudo-religion around worshipping the IDEA of science without actually being scientific, and hates anything that doesnt conform to his little cult. It's just a larp. Atheists of old didn't require science to reject God and yet they still did it. Modern ones need something to justify what was once just empty rhetoric+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ca6-9K9F: >You could've just said "God said so". Fine "God sent ten measures of diseases to the world; pigs took nine, and the rest of the world took one."+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Tnn2t-C*: Christianity is included since Christians unironically believe the Jewish Torah is somehow divinely-inspired and that the myths recorded in it are somehow factual.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @=cpBMd9C: >google jack chick >its a baptist so its a retard trying to interpret the words of a bigger retard who wasn't even christian. Baptists are not christian. They are retards who insist on interpreting the bible like a cargo cult that found it washed ashore their island, while ignoring all sorts of core concepts that the early christians fought long and hard to hammer out the details of.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @kcWer~x~: No you don't, literally all you need is salt.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @XqzG_sc8: >raw or undercooked So cook it, problem solved. Eating undercooked poultry is also bad btw.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @~AtpZdx-: Fundamentalist Christians in the US literally believe that atheists treat science like a religion. They think that atheist didn't come to any conclusions about the natural world using basic rational thinking, but that the high atheist science priest told them what to think.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

/history