Anachronistic circular reasoning. You assume that because Justin used the words “another God” he means the very same thing which your cult, which would not exist for nearly 2,000 years later, would mean. I say that he meant only that the Father and the Son are distinct. This you offer the argument that he used the words “another God”, as if the fact the words exist proves they have the meaning you would give to them. The question is what these words mean, not if they were used.