𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

𓀐 @Cs+5xsy9: "seed oil misinformation" is a wikipedia page now.

>formally study and research a topic for years, publishing novel research papers >somehow that makes you less reliable in the eyes of the unwashed masses than Gary from down the pub who 'did his own research' on wikipedia for a few hours

⧖expiring ~26d0/3 kept4d ago

𓀐 @sTqxUx_d

⏱ 1w 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]
𓀐 @ut_EE73r: >They routinely publish papers they can't replicate, which is not scientific. >They declassify other reports, revealing they were paid for by some special interest group for a specific result, not to find anything out. I'll take a stranger's anecdote into consideration, but when I see several that coincide, I raise an eyebrow+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @6vjZtsdp: If something is not reliable to replicate then it's mentioned in the papers, typically under the "limitations" section of those papers you've never read.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0