"seed oil misinformation" is a wikipedia page now.

⧖expiring ~26d0/27 kept4d ago

𓀐 @Cs+5xsy9

⏱ 1w 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐 ↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]

𓀐 @iiow=dSU: >You also have no idea what my background is By virtue of the amount of years any one person has on this earth, your background cannot be a current-knowledge expert in multiple specialized areas of scientific study, so no, retard, you will not be even a fraction as good as scientists who are research experts in their field at those tasks. The fact that you're trying to fight me on my "you're not as good at this as people who spend their entire lives researching it" point tells me that everythin…+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Coq*_Eqp: Big Tallow can't be trusted+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @p8gVa?KE: Insane how bad the anti-intellectualism craze is becoming. A vast majority of the public genuinely trust tik-tok influencers over scientists+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @ad-3KUq~: Both can be bought as easilly as anyone else.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @sTqxUx_d: >formally study and research a topic for years, publishing novel research papers >somehow that makes you less reliable in the eyes of the unwashed masses than Gary from down the pub who 'did his own research' on wikipedia for a few hours+ 2

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @ut_EE73r: >They routinely publish papers they can't replicate, which is not scientific. >They declassify other reports, revealing they were paid for by some special interest group for a specific result, not to find anything out. I'll take a stranger's anecdote into consideration, but when I see several that coincide, I raise an eyebrow+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @6vjZtsdp: If something is not reliable to replicate then it's mentioned in the papers, typically under the "limitations" section of those papers you've never read.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @p8MtPS9r: Nobody takes scientist word as gospel, they just reasonably assume it's probably true if the scientific consensus points to a particular viewpoint. >I'll look at all of these things that scientists and their papers take into account Maybe you're smart enough to realize that you're not even a fraction as good as scientists are at those tasks within their field of specialty, but probably not.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ptqxU2-M: Was 2018 really when this all started?+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @uwDdcwN-: Let me guess, soon there's going to be a thing about "HFCS misinformation" and a bunch will defend HFCS+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @mNcWWxA6: >you have to consume seed oils >why? >it's uhh.. it's uh err- good >why? >hahaha because uh it's like uh pretty good for you >well, what makes it good? >uhh yeah hahaha it's like uh probably one of the best things you can consume+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @mw92f6gi: I think that if the prevailing notion of experts in their field points towards a particular viewpoint then it's probably correct. That's not taking something as gospel like you like to pretend. I also understand that if you have no expertise in a field of study then your ability to verify such matters is going to be limited, but I doubt you'll cop to that simple fact either because you'd like to be both a layman and an expert at the same time.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Dhup2dRV: Whatever regulations we had in place were feel-good bullshit anyway Does that stop China making factories? Or the Third World polluting the rivers and oceans? Or does global warming stop when we push our problem out of the country?+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @w_29b*BX: something always going to be a scapegoat for the heavily subsidized modified corn starch, corn syrup and corn subsidies that actually kills americans first it was fat and eggs so everyone got rid of fat and there was a fat free craze but americans still got fatter and more diabetic then no fat is actually healthy its... umm it's a certain type of fat yes that's what the real problem+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @BkLzKBf8: It's not the processed foods. It's the 4000 calories a day.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @+q-x7JJz: >Second sentence of the article is Joe Rogan cope It's political now, sorry+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @hg4hf~~r: Why do the mindbroken anti-science brigade suddenly hate seed oils now, but say nothing about the well-known increase risk of death from processed meat? Why does big meat get a free pass, are they not likely to do all the bribing and conspiracy shit they imagine big seed-oil doing? Is it simply because they believe eating red meat makes them manly and badass?+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @R=vR34A2: >>VEGETABLE oil >>Check ingredients >It's actually soy "and/or" canola oil What's wrong with this? >>CORN oil >>Check ingredients >It's actually soy "and/or" canola oil Doesn't happen. >>OLIVE oil (that isn't blatantly JUST olive oil) >It's a proprietary "blend" of unknown proportions of soy "and/or" canola and still expensive as fuck Doesn't happen.+ 3

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 2

𓀐 @mi?KnWeo: Liar. I just checked my olive oil and it says "select olive oils from Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain & Tunisia"+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @5xjtyTst: >Doesn't happen.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 1

𓀐 @~xM=ZWmF: This is the most blatantly labeled food item ever created. If you don't want a blended oil don't buy the one that says CANOLA OIL BLEND in clear lettering.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @eg3zo=Sr: >But in America they can only be so vague. The US has the worst standards I know off, take a random third world country for example, like Brazil, by law one cannot call it "olive oil" if it's not pure olive oil.+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @RWEMBkSg: I don't smoke but I've read a few studies about it and they're all the same, "tobacco causes cancer, it just does, ok?" with a bunk analysis comparing coal and uranium miners who smoke to office workers that don't. The "science" is all propaganda funded by a small group of people who weren't in on the big tobacco dollars+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @DwzmE?wS: >people are consuming like 600+ calories of seed oil per day Yeah maybe you are you fat fuck+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

𓀐 @URNpZp+B: Very few people outside of America eat enough fried slop for that to ever be a serious problem+

⬆ upvote 0 ↩ reply 0

/cooking