𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(26)01199-2 In a nutshell >North African ancestry in Spain and Portugal can be traced back to the Roman empire rather than the Islamic conquest >Late antiquity to late medieval period Iberians had significantly more north African admixture than they do today >Islamic Iberians don't seem to differ genetically from those that lived there during the Roman and Visigoth period >Modern Iberians are genetically much more homogenous than their forefathers we…

⧖expiring ~18d0/42 kept1w ago

𓀐 @QhZ*GrtR

⏱ 2w 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]
𓀐 @oFbN~KjJ: >>18751638 >Italians stop lying+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @RkJUznLR: >>18752399 Your argument refutes itself because everywhere dark hell-spawned demons hold dominion is a literal hell hole.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @uZ*zNHYZ: >>18751370 also interesting, it seems like the east med ancestry in iberia is too much compared to the italic ancestry, so it can't be just from italy, a majority of it was directly from anatolia+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @oj4X5YUS: >>18751622 The problem is that you have too many people whose entire national identities and sense of pride (Moroccans, Latinx, Italians and a good chunk of the third world in general as well as many nordicists and a rather large subset of French nationalists and people with a cuckold fetish in general which tend to be over representated among the groups mentioned above) revolve around the concept of Iberians being half moor whose ancestors were raped to extinction by Nafris. The fact that nort…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @D?2Gnk-C: >>18751370 This study actually just proves got raped twice by nafris (roman nafris and moors), iberians are retarded rapebabies that are unable to understand that a study about roman era admixture does not prove that additional north african admixture wasn't introduced during Al-Andalus You are a double-raped nafri rapebaby btw+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @hCWH6c*M: >>18751701 >>18751705 Are you so retarded that you can't even read your own AIslop brown buffon?+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @iocsSzW_: >>18751910 >>18751991 >>18752049 Holy shit you're genuinely a retarded fucking spicniard Iberberians are fucking illiterate+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Kk8fVwY-: >>18751370 >>18751556 >>18751560 >>18751705 you do realize that independant berbers living in roman era north africa would often raid iberia, right? Those are not peaceful migrations the 40 BCE Mauretanian intervention in Iberia, all the Antonine Incursions (160s–170s CE) where berbers ravaged iberia for a good decade (171-179), as well as many other raids (212-305) Rome had ~5% of Morocco under control, the rest was savage berber tribes that acted the same way german did+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @T?ubmBix: >>18751944 >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period You lost. >>18751986 And so the cope begin. Saaaar we wuz conquerors n shieeet we wuz totally not slaves saaaar+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @rzrnidu3: >>18751997 >>18752017 Visibly coping >at least >500,000 berbers/arabs went into iberia in 712-1200 The ones that came with the original conquest were all wiped out as soon as they chimped out (740-743). The others were fodders and slaves who were regularly lynched. >>18752011 The great majority of them are basically slaves or prostitutes.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Wt?bYxpg: >>18751653 >East Med ancestry in Iberia is clealy Italian mediated. study disagrees, it seems directly from anatolia and the north levant+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @fyty94HV: >>18752152 They say this about them.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @q7rJ5?Ff: >>18752285 Who mentioned sexual abuse? Why are you talking about sexual abuse? Are you under the impression that North Africans are obsessed with sexual abuse? The article showed that North African ancestry has always been a part of Spain—since the Roman period, and in fact, perhaps even since the Neolithic; they were never "pure." Furthermore, there is the Anatolian ancestry that you are ignoring. Explain those samples with E1b to me.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ntuyRqc?: >>18752116 Mainland greeks were different, Classical era emporia were often mycenaean like, the dorians and macedonians were more different still Some cypriots plot with levantines+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @z?8j_yRD: >>18752345 >the dorians there's no dorian samples+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @~HGtu2J-: >>18752337 >>18752367 >>18752371 There are multiple north african admixture pulses that have been identified in multiple studies and they all happened AFTER the roman era, so yeah, you're a triple raped moor mongrel juan+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @rL?sf-eX: >>18753064 >>18753068+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @YjMAs-Nk: >>18754004 >no yes, you're the same dumbass that constantly misinterprets studies done on pre-Islamic samples and wrongly assume this must mean Al-Andalus left no admixture, even though your own studies constantly mention that the study isn't representative of modern iberians: >Future work focusing on medieval and post-medieval genomes will be essential to finally link the ancient with the modern inhabitants of the peninsula. I can tell it's you because your reading comprehension is on the kind…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @3f26?ucP: >>18754762 Iberians are the only europeans that have recent african admixture that extends from the roman age, all the way to Al-Andalus, right now there's another wave of african immigration into iberia, even though brown self hating iberberians like you like to pretend mass african migration into iberia is unprecedented or that you're not recently mixed african mongrels+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @RkJUznLR: Your argument refutes itself because everywhere dark hell-spawned demons hold dominion is a literal hell hole.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @~HGtu2J-: There are multiple north african admixture pulses that have been identified in multiple studies and they all happened AFTER the roman era, so yeah, you're a triple raped moor mongrel juan+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @KJ26+LXB: is this actually new? we already knew most of this stuff+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @uZ*zNHYZ: also interesting, it seems like the east med ancestry in iberia is too much compared to the italic ancestry, so it can't be just from italy, a majority of it was directly from anatolia+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @oj4X5YUS: The problem is that you have too many people whose entire national identities and sense of pride (Moroccans, Latinx, Italians and a good chunk of the third world in general as well as many nordicists and a rather large subset of French nationalists and people with a cuckold fetish in general which tend to be over representated among the groups mentioned above) revolve around the concept of Iberians being half moor whose ancestors were raped to extinction by Nafris. The fact that north african a…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @D?2Gnk-C: This study actually just proves got raped twice by nafris (roman nafris and moors), iberians are retarded rapebabies that are unable to understand that a study about roman era admixture does not prove that additional north african admixture wasn't introduced during Al-Andalus You are a double-raped nafri rapebaby btw+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @hCWH6c*M: Are you so retarded that you can't even read your own AIslop brown buffon?+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @iocsSzW_: Holy shit you're genuinely a retarded fucking spicniard Iberberians are fucking illiterate+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Kk8fVwY-: you do realize that independant berbers living in roman era north africa would often raid iberia, right? Those are not peaceful migrations the 40 BCE Mauretanian intervention in Iberia, all the Antonine Incursions (160s–170s CE) where berbers ravaged iberia for a good decade (171-179), as well as many other raids (212-305) Rome had ~5% of Morocco under control, the rest was savage berber tribes that acted the same way german did+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @T?ubmBix: >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period >no additional ancestry entered during the Islamic period You lost. And so the cope begin. Saaaar we wuz conquerors n shieeet we wuz totally not slaves saaaar+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @rzrnidu3: Visibly coping >at least >500,000 berbers/arabs went into iberia in 712-1200 The ones that came with the original conquest were all wiped out as soon as they chimped out (740-743). The others were fodders and slaves who were regularly lynched. The great majority of them are basically slaves or prostitutes.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Wt?bYxpg: >East Med ancestry in Iberia is clealy Italian mediated. study disagrees, it seems directly from anatolia and the north levant+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @fyty94HV: They say this about them.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @CGScKKvc: A major own-goal for the nationalists. The peoples of North Africa have always been part of Iberian history. We are brothers, not enemies. This connection has existed since the Neolithic era. Native North African ancestry—the Iberomaurusians—is our link. Take pride in your North African ancestry, Mediterranean brothers. This is what sets us apart from barbarians.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 2

𓀐 @+S?JxL+t: >>18752272 >>18752282 Daily reminder that this "we wuz always nafri mongrels n shiet" cope constantly parroted by iberberians on /his/ nowadays is a product of them being irrefutably buckbroken by the undeniable moor rapebaby allegations, so instead of denying they're nonwhite mongrels, they're now claiming they wuz always mongrels n shiet lmao (but Al-Andalus still left absolutely zero genetic admixture o algo !!!!!)+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @+S?JxL+t: Daily reminder that this "we wuz always nafri mongrels n shiet" cope constantly parroted by iberberians on /his/ nowadays is a product of them being irrefutably buckbroken by the undeniable moor rapebaby allegations, so instead of denying they're nonwhite mongrels, they're now claiming they wuz always mongrels n shiet lmao (but Al-Andalus still left absolutely zero genetic admixture o algo !!!!!)+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @q7rJ5?Ff: Who mentioned sexual abuse? Why are you talking about sexual abuse? Are you under the impression that North Africans are obsessed with sexual abuse? The article showed that North African ancestry has always been a part of Spain—since the Roman period, and in fact, perhaps even since the Neolithic; they were never "pure." Furthermore, there is the Anatolian ancestry that you are ignoring. Explain those samples with E1b to me.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ntuyRqc?: Mainland greeks were different, Classical era emporia were often mycenaean like, the dorians and macedonians were more different still Some cypriots plot with levantines+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @YjMAs-Nk: >no yes, you're the same dumbass that constantly misinterprets studies done on pre-Islamic samples and wrongly assume this must mean Al-Andalus left no admixture, even though your own studies constantly mention that the study isn't representative of modern iberians: >Future work focusing on medieval and post-medieval genomes will be essential to finally link the ancient with the modern inhabitants of the peninsula. I can tell it's you because your reading comprehension is on the kindergarden le…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @3f26?ucP: Iberians are the only europeans that have recent african admixture that extends from the roman age, all the way to Al-Andalus, right now there's another wave of african immigration into iberia, even though brown self hating iberberians like you like to pretend mass african migration into iberia is unprecedented or that you're not recently mixed african mongrels+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @xo~9PHnH: Bullshit, there are more samples (42) in the 2019 study that are from 711CE onwards than in OP study (25), you can count them yourself in both spreadsheets in the supplementary materials, you just made up bullshit again Also this is irrelevant since both studies from 2019 and 2026 confirm that there was additional geneflow from north africa after 711CE From the 2019 study: >The impact of Muslim rule is also evident in northeast Iberia in seven individuals from Sant Julià de Ramis from the 8–12t…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @6_m?d3UZ: They're talking about the genetic impact after 711CE in general, your reading comprehension is absolute dogshit >ie north Iberians moving south who then mixed with the already mutted southern iberians and homogenized the north african admixture, which is why pretty much all iberians except basques now have recent north african admixture If you want to conside african octoroon mongrels as white because it makes you feel better about yourself, then go ahead, just don't come shitting up this board…+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0