𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

Yes, Churchill was a racist but he also saved the humanity from hordes of subhuman pagan nazi pedophiles and crushed them without mercy. He kept on fighting despite the odds and his brave English Crusaders drown nazi child groomers in fire and iron from the air. Hamburg, Berlin and Dresden were turned to ashes, alongside with nazis dream about the aryan world, all crushed under the enormous power of Western Christian civilisation. If Churchill was never born, you would live in a nazi dominated world

⧖expiring ~30d0/27 kept9m ago

𓀐 @K+_fth8o

⏱ 8h 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]
𓀐 @QRgE3v3p: >saved the humanity I'd agree with you if Britain was still white+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @F+9vM-?2: Heroic knight of our glorious Empire who crushed nazi child groomers without mercy+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @konRZp*c: Hero who saved the British Empire and our pristine English motherland from hordes of subhuman germanic apes+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @iYEcTRLf: Britain was 99% white at the time of his death and was still 94% white as of the 1991 census. Blame Blair and Johnson for the UKs current demographics. In before autistic screeching about how Blair was a CIA spy ordered to import a billion Pakistanis for no reason.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 2

𓀐 @jT7=zk?w: um no sweety, defeating the racism nazi of ww2 meant importing gorillions of third world garbage is good and you are a bad if you don't like it+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @KoY8WrK-: I've seen you post this inane comment in multiple threads now so I'll finally respond. Blair and Johnson come from opposite sides of the political dialectic. If they both support an issue then that means the entire political establishment supports that issue. You didn't mention May or Cameron or Starmer or John Major, all of whom also support mass migration. The problem of immigration is a problem of the postwar Western political establishment, which yes, has to do with America's leadership over the Western world. You're either incapable of understanding this or deliberately attempting to obfuscate. I'll do you the favour by assuming it's the latter.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @xWVF82TH: American-led world engaged in a great prosperity and peace on a scale that wasn't seen since Roman Empire+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @+VDJw3ot: >commie subhuman thread glorifying Churchill funny+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @tYFDsfpr: >im a national socialist sure you are. Churchill was just a stubborn germanophobe without any further vision or foresight. If he cared about the white race and the britsh empire first, he would have tried to ally with Hitler against the commie subhumans+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @u*GkMx3C: >Admits it's all fake >Tried to make Blair and Johnson being in different fake camps a gotcha Didn't think I'd notice huh you duplicitous little rat? When did Cameron openly say he was deliberately increasing immigration?+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @S=JgWCk7: >When did Cameron openly say Apparently, according to this Jew, what a politician does matters less than what he says. The pea-brained mind of a Jew is a truly remarkable thing+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @H=GGpcc=: >Anglos are anti German because of Disraeli Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrretard.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @rcfmUBdE: >visting a Zoo or looking at the pictures online So because you can observe a difference, that means you exclude certain hominids from having the right to live next to you, breed your daughter and vote in your elections?+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @zERq2dTw: apes are not able to breed with humans or vote in elections+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @ZZB7EH6s: >Even if that were true (it's not) It's true, the reality might make you angry or sad but it's still a reality > that mindset and behavior is what matters yes, nad mindset and behavior have no correlation with melanin level in the skin+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @56i-DPca: >how so? After having acquired the skills required for civilization and technology in the north, the light races moved south and did those things. Often enslaving the dark races for agricultural and mining purposes where such people could be easily caught from the wilderness where they lived in stone age tribal societies.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @SK5poFvf: No source even as much as implies that people from Europe came to bulid civilisation in Middle East, Egypt, India, China and Americas+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @JaAi7Khg: there are non European light races in eastern Asia, and it seems asinine to suggest mesopotamian civilization was dark races because that's like saying monkeys built the pyramids if the dark races were civilization builders then they would have civilizations today+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @a3jmrarp: any claims that it was dark races that founded any civilization are self refuting because dark races are incapable of the task. You have to deny reality to believe the dark races can have founded any civilization anywhere.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @D95bNj?2: Middle East, India, Africa, China and Americas are the brithplace of civilisations, Ethiopia is one of the oldest country in the world, alongside Egypt, India and China+ 3

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @g=R6XZq+: Brown people, the result of whites and blacks mixing, currently squat in the ruins of ancient white civilizations. Its not a coincidence that those places are shitholes today instead of being the center of modern civilization.+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @4Lq~A5rs: >Brown people, the result of whites and blacks mixing Most brown ethnic groups have 0 to negligible SSA admixture+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @dmat4anu: That's not true. MENA have up to 20% SSA admixture. And SSA is not the only source of so-called "black" features. It's a variety of Erectus and similar archaic hominids who have interbred with other hominids, including Sapiens. Archaics (incl. H. Erectus) had a range that matches extanct "black" and "brown" people. H. Neanderthalis and Denisovan had a range that matches the civilized races anon is referring to (incl. northern Asians) and some of the modern "brown" people. Archaeogenetics show known interbreeding events that funnelled archaics into extant populations in SSA (major) and SEA (minor). Inversely, extanct Eurasians have Neanderthal admixture.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @xSwTKfiL: >Ancient Egyptians themselves depicted them >posts drawing by a German+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @fhr*r5jg: well, do you have any sources that support your point?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @TFcZ98y?: >Then once the study of genetics came online, genetic research proved the old anthropologists right. Lie, moden genetric reserach disproved old works, the same way that modern biology disproved the fact that maggots are animated rooting meat and not just born from flie's eggs+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0