𓁟 host1.bitchan.one

I have read and analyzed some 500 romance novels in order to complete the other half of Campbell's work. The archetypes herein are encoded into the female brain by evolution and can be observed even in simple high school social dynamics. Understand this and you understand women.

⧖expiring ~27d0/25 kept3d ago

𓀐 @JLvT9CeD

⏱ 4d 👍 0

⬆ upvote 0

[⇥] sort oldest ⏱

⬆[⏱]₿⚠

👍👎✔

𓀐↩⛓⚠

[⇥] flip, oldest first

filter [-]
𓀐 @zwM6TmQk: >all this incel schizobabble to rationalize why you’re still a virgin at 28+ 3

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @bBmJW+?a: >someone insinuated there might be patterns to how women behave >ecod! I must prevent anyone from discussing this!+ 2

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @xCs~v5rN: He's right though, the "pattern" here strongly suggests you're a poorly socialized adult male virgin and this suggests your opinions aren't to be taken very seriously. People with emotional development problems aren't likely to be correct about anything other than by accident. No, you're not Nikola Tesla preserving your mental purity alone in your cave, you're just, statistically given this website and the material you think is clever, another dopamine-addicted coward. I'll be nice and let you in on (one) massive flaw in your work: you suggest that "because there are patterns", this must suggest a truth, but you **have failed to established that the patterns you claim occur actually exist**. As opposed to just your stunted, internet-addicted adult virgin perceptions of how you think the proverbial fairer sex acts.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @2T4-9+b8: A woman wrote this.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Z7UmHMwM: You might want to compare your notes with Murdock's book+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @XVtKc7+5: Name 1 story+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @8omKp=pY: Not OP, but Beauty and the Beast.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @jDR9R5h-: >harry potter this thread is trash+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @N?C95kHK: Anon romance novels are probably not the best place to pull data from. Try mythology and see of the outcome is different.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @qF9BoR4y: >Hero is atteacted to but rejects barbarian Pomni doesn't like Jax at the start. >Rape by Barbarian Jax bullies Pomni >self guilt from enjoying the act Not really? She doesn't enjoy it. >Barbarian introduces to his tribe Episode 4. Pomni and Jax bond at Spudzies. >mean girl bullies pomni Ragatha, I suppose. Maybe Zooble. >mother figure Ragatha also. >Heroine faces suspicion and tries to fix barbarian's past This was from episode 5 to 6. Ends in a huge conflict between Pomni and Jax >nice giy plots hero's demise. Kinger? Caine? I suppose Ragatha is kinda working as the nice guy here, too. She's a very versatile character. Zooble is also the one who kinda starts giving Jax problems. >conflict >betrayal The conflict results in Jax abandoning both his tribe and Pomni. Pomni actually fully integrates with the tribe. Pomni is hurt by this. Jax is hurt by this. Then, Jax essentially dies, but not really. He turns into a zombie or ghost, basically, haunting the land. But then some fucked up rushed shit happens. Pomni has a lesbian relationship with Ragatha out of nowhere. >The grovel Pomni takes a risk to her survival and goes into Jax's ghost form and accesses his subconscious, where she eventually locates him after revealing his mental illness and saying that he hates her. A subplot flashback happens with another girl, Ribbit, who it's revealed Jax indirectly killed because of his traumatic past and inability to deal. It plays out similar to Pomni, except Jax chose the tribe and Ribbit commited suicide. He wants to go back with Pomni, but he can't because he's dead. Ironically, because of Zooble, inadvertently. >self-actualization Pomni makes piece with Jax being dead. She fucks Ragatha, and they all live happily ever after and visits Jax's ghost form(which is like a dog) uwu. Even when the barbarian is the incel, he's not allowed to win if the franchise gets too large.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @h9R9KFXx: You can do fiction analysis without appealing to retarded evo-psych just-so stories about why [modern phenomenon] dates back to the mesolithic, Anon. Just say you've observed this in Romantasy fem-gooner novels and make your conclusions on the readership. It isn't it. There are some polls about it being the most populat paraphilia, but nothing like sufficient.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @6FHd6hDd: explain omegaverse tropes without evo-psych I dare you >estrous >nesting instinct >scent glands >exaggerated dimorphism+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @MVx-2s4h: >I have read No you haven't. >analyzed Absolutely not. >500 romance novels In your head, possibly. >to complete Nonono, none of this is believable. I don't believe a word in your post. If any of this was actually true, you would have cited examples, and you'd present this in a place where you did not expect a choir of yesmen agreeing with you without demanding any evidence.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @C-4GdQSZ: Reasonable, I also think that "read 500 romance novels" claim is quite farfetched. However, those themes are in fact quite common in smut and romance novels, there are many research papers that demonstrate this. For example, here's one about women rape fantasies, it also illuminates themes of "adversary transformation" i.e, molding barbaric men into things that fit the protagonist's needs. So he isn't entirely wrong either. >https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-05921-009+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @hm88kr~8: wonder why civilization failed to emerge after 300,000 years of supposed women civilizing of men, only arising after and due to restraining women's antisocial tendencies, perhaps because women sexual selection ordains a constant state of conflict and warfare lol.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @pumqmidp: >If a man has no good within him, there is nothing to bring out. what good is supposedly within a barbarian that warrants the effort to bring out instead of simply pairing with normal (non-barbaric) men? admit that taming a psychopathic animal capable of exploiting others and turning it into an obedient pet is the pinnacle of female sexual fantasies, maybe that might resolve the cognitive dissonance you have >human families living together out of a desire to be together already is civilization. The oppressive patriarchy that came after, that is the result of empty men wanting to hurt and oppress women. men do not hurt women for the sack of it, they simply want to get pussy, which might coincide with women's wellbeing or suffering as mere by-products. the whole aim of the so called patriarchy was to distribute women evenly to prevent conflict among men, which was rampant in pre-agrarian semi-barbaric societies, contrary to your utopian feminist portrayals. maybe read a non-feminist book for once+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @pU_PY*=A: Women are the reason that site was created in the first place Men are the reason it's been brought down temporarily Women are happily enjoying their fanfiction for decades, suddenly incels discover Malfoy is a good love interest but gay sex icks them, so they turn to AI to make Malfoy a woman and ao3 needs downtime to deal with that AI shit Men ALWAYS ruin good things created by women. This is why we need to gatekeep men out of women's hobbies like books and writing.+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @-fAnpNQy: >This is why we need to gatekeep men out of women's hobbies like books and writing. Ah funny how now that the shoe is on the other foot you want gatekeeping. What happened to invading scifi and fantasy conventions with your DEI quotas and wanting a 'marginalized identity' in every Hugo nomination? It's ironic you're all behind Sarkeesian pointing out sexist tropes in video games, but the male love interest in all romance stories are NPC's. They're essentially tulpas designed for the heroine's masturbation. They're telepathic. They somehow run billion dollar industries despite their world revolving around pleasuring a woman and sniffing out her pheromones. Let's not forget about the female gaze of those Fabio covers. So why don't we make goodreads and ao3 a bit more egalitarian like the wokies always wanted.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @wd5+wbYN: You’re a virgin who hates women. So you pretend to be them and make bad arguments on purpose so you can reply to yourself as the opposition and bump your shitty misogynistic thread. Does that make it clearer, incel?+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Ck~_DMvJ: Idk man look at China they have laws banning kids from watching porn and gaming and shits pretty lit there. No homeless people shooting up on the streets. No LGBTQ bullshit shoved in your face, but its not illegal to be gay. Food and housing are cheap. No one stormed their capital because of some retarded Facebook posts about an election being stolen. Thats what we need. Hard rules for the idiots that live in this country.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @f~R_wZcH: Well depends what the thing is. Women love reading and writing. Men have tried to keep women out of reading and writing for a long time, but women genuinely love it. Hence 2nd wave feminists are right to want a space for women to read and write the things they like. Fantasy, romantasy are huge with women. You just sound like you want to keep women from their hobbies.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @Aj=jYuaS: Within feminist tought, tailoring to specific individual preferences is already inherently biased, because it creates a feedback effect that acts as a gatekeeping mechanism for the next generation. >men write scifi >so boys read scifi >so more boys who grow up into men write scifi >so more boys go into STEM >so there's a giant systemic bias feedback loop+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0

𓀐 @k~i?-h?p: >feminazi is illiterate Who's complaining? You're the one talking about ao3 being a "women's space" and not wanting its culture to be changed by a wave of men. I'm just sitting on the sidelines laughing at you+ 1

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 1

𓀐 @7JEw=72c: But that's objectively correct. Look what a wave of males did to ao3, AI bros put the site down for 4 weeks.That never happened with women.+

⬆ upvote 0↩ reply 0